| House Republican Office | ||
| Press Release | Contact: Jim Rivers | |
| February 1, 2008 | 271-6277 | |
Majority
Proposal Goes Well Beyond Adequacy
“The report
of the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Costing an
Adequate Education, released today, clearly goes well beyond
adequacy,” said committee member Rep. David Hess (R-Hooksett),
following a 6-3 committee vote at the State House in
The committee,
created by the passage of HB 927, was charged with defining an
adequate education as the specific criteria and substantive
education program—defined and identified as the school approval
standards in nine specific areas.
In doing so, the law adopted, in their entirety, more than
30 pages of the Standards of Public School Approval in existence
on the effective date of the bill.
According to
Hess, “The Express reference to those standards, in the context
of the charge to the committee, evidenced clear legislative
intent. In the end,
the Majority ignored this directive and, in many critical areas,
substituted its own opinion for the standards, universally
resulting in increasing and inflating the costs of education.”
Republicans on the committee believe that the continuity in
public policy and past definitions are very important in this
effort to cost an adequate education.
Republicans on
the committee also disagreed with the Majority of
Democrats over the appropriate funding levels for other
elements of the costing formula, e.g., the per pupil allocations
for educational materials, technology and transportation, targeted
aid for free & reduced lunch recipients and special education
students. The
disagreements between the two sides appear to create a difference
of more than $200M between the statewide cost of adequacy based on
the Majority’s assumptions as opposed to the standards espoused
by the Republicans on the committee.
The most significant in this regard concerns the
qualifications used to determine the salaries for the professional
positions used in the formula.
“In the end,
this report represents a significant difference in how targeted
aid is calculated and how the dollars are distributed,” said Ken
Weyler (R-Kingston), a member of the committee.